Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Policy Senate results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 355 hits . Analysis detected 2,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,961 of 37,536 keywords). This Foreign Policy Senate is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Foreign Policy Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst