Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foraging results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 784 hits . Analysis detected 7,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,546 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,847 of 37,536 keywords). This Foraging is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Foraging
Keyword details
Total words: 7,546
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst