Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These For All Mankind results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 2,010 hits . Analysis detected 8,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,726 of 37,536 keywords). This For All Mankind is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. For All Mankind
Keyword details
Total words: 5,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 37.4% 37.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst