Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foodies Eat First Fest results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 2,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,369 of 37,536 keywords). This Foodies Eat First Fest is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Foodies Eat First Fest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠54%Foodies Eat First Fest (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos