Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Food Processing results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 492 hits . Analysis detected 4,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,476 keywords). This Food Processing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Food Processing
Keyword details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst