Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Labeling results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Labeling is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Food Labeling
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Food Labeling (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos