Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Festival results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 676 hits . Analysis detected 3,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,941 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,604 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Festival is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Food Festival
Keyword details
Total words: 2,941
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst