Keyword summary
52%1 analyzed article/video1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Florida Nursing Homes results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 3,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,746 of 37,447 keywords). This Florida Nursing Homes is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Florida Nursing Homes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Florida Nursing Homes (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos