Keyword summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video1,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flint City Council results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 631 hits. Analysis detected 2,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,498 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Flint City Council is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Flint City Council
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠44%Flint City Council (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,498
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos