Keyword summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flies results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 538 hits. Analysis detected 3,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,037 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,595 of 34,833 keywords). This Flies is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Flies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
21%Flies (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,037
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate