Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fish City results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,677 of 36,899 keywords). This Fish City is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Fish City
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
69%Fish City (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos