Keyword summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiscal Impact results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 6,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,522 of 37,536 keywords). This Fiscal Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Fiscal Impact
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠88%Fiscal Impact (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 35.0%35.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.0%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos