Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These First Amendment Elections results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 4,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,119 of 34,833 keywords). This First Amendment Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
First Amendment Elections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
80%First Amendment Elections (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos