Keyword summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fines results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 2,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,621 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (32,368 of 35,444 keywords). This Fines is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Fines
Keyword details
Total words: 5,621
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst