Keyword summary
17%3 analyzed articles/videos2,931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Wellness results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 5,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,201 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,399 of 37,536 keywords). This Financial Wellness is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Financial Wellness
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
6%Financial Wellness (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,201
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate