Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Management results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Quote-first Misdirection , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 556 hits . Analysis detected 2,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,365 of 37,533 keywords). This Financial Management is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Financial Management
Keyword details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.1% 24.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst