Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Losses results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 5,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,825 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,700 of 37,536 keywords). This Financial Losses is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Financial Losses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Financial Losses (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,825
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 24.1%24.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.1%8.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos