Keyword summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Hardship results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hindsight Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,866 of 37,536 keywords). This Financial Hardship is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Financial Hardship
Keyword details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst