Keyword summary
60%1 analyzed article/video1,478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fillmore Linen Service results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 3,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Fillmore Linen Service is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Fillmore Linen Service
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
25%Fillmore Linen Service (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,434
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos