Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fighting For Michigan Pac results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 3,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Fighting For Michigan Pac is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fighting For Michigan Pac
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos