Keyword summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fight For 15 results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,406 hits. Analysis detected 9,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,902 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,555 of 37,536 keywords). This Fight For 15 is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Fight For 15
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Fight For 15 (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,902
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos