Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifth Circuit results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 2,029 hits. Analysis detected 8,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,785 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Fifth Circuit is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Fifth Circuit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Fifth Circuit (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,785
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate