Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fibrosis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,957 of 37,536 keywords). This Fibrosis is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Fibrosis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Fibrosis (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos