Keyword summary
⁠83%4 analyzed articles/videos2,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferguson results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 2,268 hits. Analysis detected 15,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,608 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (20,377 of 37,536 keywords). This Ferguson is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Ferguson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠46%Ferguson (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,608
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate