Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Female Candidates results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 571 hits . Analysis detected 3,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,933 of 37,536 keywords). This Female Candidates is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Female Candidates
Keyword details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst