Keyword summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future Scandal results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,179 of 37,536 keywords). This Feeding Our Future Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Feeding Our Future Scandal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠76%Feeding Our Future Scandal (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos