Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future Scam results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 1,013 hits . Analysis detected 5,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,391 of 37,536 keywords). This Feeding Our Future Scam is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Feeding Our Future Scam
Keyword details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.2% 40.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.2% 25.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst