Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Tax Cap results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 3,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,299 keywords). This Federal Tax Cap is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Federal Tax Cap
Keyword details
Total words: 2,984
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst