Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Spending results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 4,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Spending is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Federal Spending (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.7%29.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos