Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Raid results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 874 hits . Analysis detected 4,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,172 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Raid is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Federal Raid
Keyword details
Total words: 4,584
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst