Keyword summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Protections results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 888 hits . Analysis detected 3,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,452 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Protections is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Federal Protections
Keyword details
Total words: 3,135
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst