Keyword summary
80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Payments results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,459 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (15,828 of 34,420 keywords). This Federal Payments is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Federal Payments
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Federal Payments (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,459
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate