Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Nutrition Program results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,473 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Nutrition Program is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Federal Nutrition Program
Keyword details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst