Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Nutrition Program results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,473 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Nutrition Program is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Federal Nutrition Program
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos