Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding World Cup results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 996 hits. Analysis detected 4,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,075 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (10,439 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Funding World Cup is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Federal Funding World Cup
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,075
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos