Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos1,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Conviction results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 605 hits. Analysis detected 3,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,735 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Conviction is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Federal Conviction
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Federal Conviction (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate