Keyword summary
48%1 analyzed article/video312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Contracting results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 747 faulty-reasoning hits from 936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,953 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Contracting is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Federal Contracting
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Federal Contracting (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.8% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles936 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos