Keyword summary
58%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Claim results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 2,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 50% (25,430 of 50,884 keywords). This Federal Claim is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Federal Claim
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
50%Federal Claim (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos