Keyword summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Budget results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 524 hits . Analysis detected 5,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,402 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Budget is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Federal Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 5,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst