Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Agencies results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,989 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Agencies is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Federal Agencies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Federal Agencies (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.5%23.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos