Keyword summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 1,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fat Soluble Vitamins results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 278 hits . Analysis detected 1,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,411 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,075 of 35,659 keywords). This Fat Soluble Vitamins is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Fat Soluble Vitamins
Keyword details
Total words: 3,411
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst