Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fashion Designers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,989 of 37,536 keywords). This Fashion Designers is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Fashion Designers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst