Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fashion & Beauty results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 3,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,935 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Fashion & Beauty is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fashion & Beauty
Keyword details
Total words: 1,935
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst