Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Farrah Abraham Fhm Ai Photoshoot results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 1,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Farrah Abraham Fhm Ai Photoshoot is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Farrah Abraham Fhm Ai Photoshoot
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos