Keyword summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fabrication Process results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 741 hits . Analysis detected 2,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,929 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,050 of 37,536 keywords). This Fabrication Process is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Fabrication Process
Keyword details
Total words: 1,929
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.5% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 38.4% 38.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 38.4%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst