Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Existing In New York City results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 5,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,732 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (24,286 of 37,536 keywords). This Existing In New York City is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Existing In New York City
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,732
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos