Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Pay results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 3,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,512 of 37,536 keywords). This Executive Pay is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Executive Pay
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Executive Pay (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos