Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exam Paper Leaks results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,933 of 37,536 keywords). This Exam Paper Leaks is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Exam Paper Leaks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Exam Paper Leaks (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos