Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Everlane results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,610 of 37,533 keywords). This Everlane is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Everlane
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Everlane (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos