Keyword summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethics Investigation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 1,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,265 of 37,536 keywords). This Ethics Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Ethics Investigation
Keyword details
Total words: 4,444
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst