Keyword summary
19%1 analyzed article/video1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Lin results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 2,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,886 of 37,536 keywords). This Ethan Lin is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Ethan Lin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
16%Ethan Lin (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510015.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos